FOREWORD
Before I begin, I would like to thank my friend Nic Sanderson for helping me with this blossay. This is actually my second final draft (the first one really sucked) and Nic is one of the reasons this one turned out okay. He watched the film with me and helped point out details I have missed, and our discussions on the film helped me more fully develop my ideas and theories about the film. Although this blossay is mine, the ideas cannot be said to be completely mine as his input was invaluable. Thank you, Nic. You were a huge help.
Before I begin, I would like to thank my friend Nic Sanderson for helping me with this blossay. This is actually my second final draft (the first one really sucked) and Nic is one of the reasons this one turned out okay. He watched the film with me and helped point out details I have missed, and our discussions on the film helped me more fully develop my ideas and theories about the film. Although this blossay is mine, the ideas cannot be said to be completely mine as his input was invaluable. Thank you, Nic. You were a huge help.
THE PLOT
Ang Lee’s
film Eat Drink Man Woman is a
beautiful film focusing on the personal and professional lives of an old
widowed chef and his three daughters. The chef, known as Chu, lives with his
three daughters in the Taiwanese city of Taipei. Once a week, Chef Chu lovingly
cooks a large traditional Chinese dinner for his daughters to share with him.
Despite losing much of his sense of taste due to old age, he pours his love for
his daughters into each meal. He begins to cook lunches for Shan-shan, the
young daughter of the Jin-Rong, a close family friend. Jin-Rong’s mother
returns from America to help Jin-Rong through her divorce, and it appears that
Chu and the mother have a bit of a romance. However, it is revealed that Chu
and Jin-Rong have had a secret romance for quite some time and that they are
planning on getting married.
Chu’s eldest daughter, Jia-Jen, is
a chemistry teacher who has never truly recovered from getting her heart broken
in college. She is a Christian woman, which is fairly rare in Taiwan, and
harshly reprimands a student for having a love not in class. Afterwards, she receives
a series of anonymous love notes that she suspects who is the new volleyball
coach. She slowly falls in love with him, but finds out that it was not the
coach that had written the notes, but a group of students getting revenge
against her. When the coach goes to console her, she kisses him, and the two
get married to each other quite suddenly.
Chu’s second oldest daughter,
Jia-Chien, is a very successful airline executive. At the beginning of the film
she is involved in a casual sexual relationship with her former boyfriend,
Raymond. Raymond had helped her find a new apartment so she could move out of
her father’s house. Jia-Chien and Chu have a complex relationship, and the two
are constantly in conflict. This is largely due to Jia-Chien’s love of
traditional cooking. She had wanted to become a chef, a male-dominated career
path, and follow in her father’s footsteps. Chu refused to allow her to do
this, and instead made her go to business school so she could “learn something
useful.” Unfortunately, the apartment she had bought was a scam, and the
apartment complex was never finished. At her job, she meets a handsome young man
named Li Kai. Li Kai and Jia-Chien develop a bit of a romance as sexual tension
between the two rises. This coincides with Jia-Chien being offered a promotion
that would require her to move to Berlin. While she is being faced with such a
life-changing decision, she realizes that Li Kai is the name of the man who
broke he older sister’s heart in college. The realization comes right before
the two are about to have sex. Li Kai explains that he never even met Jia-Jen,
but that he was dating her best friend in college. This comes as a huge shock
to Jia-Chien, but she decides to not become Li Kai’s lover anyway. In the end,
she is the only one that stays single. She lives alone in her father’s house,
and takes over the duty of cooking the traditional Sunday dinner.
Chu’s youngest daughter, Jia-Ning,
is a twenty year old student who works part time as a cashier at a fast food
restaurant. A friend of hers from work is dating a young artist and
existentialist. However, she treats him poorly, and constantly blows him off
and stands him up. Jia-Ning befriends him, and they develop feelings for each
other. They act upon their feelings, which results in Jia-Ning becoming
pregnant with his child. She announces this at Sunday dinner, and then promptly
moves in with him.
Feminism
With so
many female roles, an immediate question that comes to minds is if a man can
ever be truly equipped to represent a feminist movie. Specifically, did Ang Lee
challenge gender roles and create strong female characters (in a feminist
sense) in this film? It is a tough question; one that I did not come to a final
conclusion on. However, there are numerous aspects of the movie that are at
least problematic from a feminist viewpoint.
Marriage
is a recurring theme in Chinese film (at least in the films we have seen this
semester) and Eat Drink Man Woman is
no exception. Nearly all of the female to female interactions that involve a
non-family member involve a discussion on marriage or the conversation somehow
fixates on a man. Even the interactions between the sisters focus on males.
They are either focusing on each other’s relationships (or lack thereof), their
father’s relationships (or lack thereof), or their father’s health and well-being.
It is rare for them to talk about movie out, and when they do it is usually in
the context of their father and how it affects him, not each other.
In
fact, the women in the movie are largely identified and defined by their
relation to men. To begin, the three sisters are all Chu’s daughters, and that
is how they are mostly thought of; as daughters, not sisters or individuals. Each of them is then further defined by the
men in their life that is not their father. Jia-Chien is involved with Raymond
and then Li Kai. Both of these men are rebellious and disregard or disrespect the
authority of patriarchal figures. However, they are still entirely patriarchal
in the way they view and treat women, or how they view themselves in relation
to others. In short, their dominance over other makes them patriarchs themselves,
and Jia-Chen’s relationship to them prevents her from ever seeming independent.
Jia-Jen is similar in how she is defined by her fascination and eventual
marriage with the volleyball coach. Jia-Ning has almost no individual story
line that isn’t somehow relating to her lover. At some points of the film, the
women are identified by their current lack of a relationship with men. For
instance, Jin-Rong is known as the woman that is going through the divorce. The
film does not elaborate on her much until she is then revealed to be Chu’s
lover. Jia-Chien is known as the broken hearted teacher that will likely never
marry. Meanwhile, Chu and his colleague and best friend Old Wen are defined in
ways that are not dependent on others. They are seen and portrayed as
individuals.
Jia-Chien
definitely seems as though she is capable of being viewed as just an
individual, but on closer examination she seems less and less like a strong
female character. She is completely defined by her patriarchal society. Instead
of becoming a chef like she wanted, she was banned from the kitchen and sent to
business school. After school, she still can’t escape the patriarchal hierarchy
that has rule over her life. At her job, she is looked down due to her female
status. She is promoted, not because of her hard work, but because the other
men weren’t good enough. As her boss put it, “All the men I have sent over are
idiots. You’ll have to do,” At all of the low points in her storyline, she
seeks comfort in a patriarchal figure, specifically Raymond. At the end of the
film, it seems as though she has finally achieved a sense of individuality.
However, it is unclear if that is actually the destiny she chose, or if that
was forced onto her by the actions of others. After all, it is Raymond who
leaves her, not the other way around. Li Kai is the one that says that they
should remain good friends. She didn’t decide to live alone as much as her
family left her alone in their old house. This all happens after she decided to
not take the Berlin job so she can stay with her father, not for herself.
Jia-Jen
is the other character where her relation to patriarchy seems far more obvious.
At the beginning, she has no relationship to other men. In fact, she is content
to simply take care of her father until he dies. She essentially wants to take
up a non-sexual wife role to Chu. At one point, Jia-Chien and Jia-Jen have a
conversation on how Jia-Chien thinks Jia-Jen’s only hope to ‘escape’ from this
life is to find a man to marry. Although this conversation is already
problematic in and of itself, it is made worse by Jia-Jen then undergoing a radical
life change for a man, getting married, and then leaving. She claims she wouldn’t
want to be “loved for her voice” at the beginning. She didn’t want her relationships
with other to be superficial. Yet, she radically changes her appearance so she
can become involved with the volleyball coach. As she falls in love with the
volleyball coach, she stops listening to choral music, and instead focuses of
the coach. She isn’t ‘gaining’ a relationship with a man, but actually, she is
replacing another man, Jesus, with the coach. In fact, earlier in the movie,
Old Wen jokes that Jia-Jen has the perfect ‘boy-friend’, Jesus. And, just like
Jia-Jen, at her lowest point in her storyline, when she finds out the letters
are a prank by some students, she turns not to her family but to the coach, a
man, for comfort, and kisses him.
Patriarchy
The way
Ang Lee portrays patriarchy in Eat Drink
Man Woman is also problematic in the way it reinforces certain notions of
how a patriarchal figure, specifically the father, is supposed to act. Chu is
in many ways a stereotypical patriarch. He is distant in many ways, mildly
authoritarian, and has difficulty showing his love for others. His main way of
showing affection is cooking. Chu tells Old Wen at one point, “I cook with my
feelings, not my taste.” He pours his heart and soul into each Sunday dinner.
It is his way of showing his love for his daughters. But, he never explicitly
indicates that to his daughters, which leads to them not appreciating the Sunday
dinner and feeling at times as though he is unexpressive to them. Interestingly
enough, there aren’t any scenes in the movie that he shows love and affection
for Jin-Rong. Instead, all of his affection is sent through Jin-Rong’s daughter
in the form of cooked lunches. It could
even be that Chu is at heart a father, and can’t give that up. Or, perhaps
being a father is the only way he remembers how to love. Even when he announces
to the family that he is to move in with Jin-Rong, he first takes several shots
of alcohol, and even then he announces it like he is reading an official
report.
Chu
does show love in another way that is a more traditional form of patriarchal
love. He uses his authority and power to fall back into a disciplinary role
that is for the ‘good of the family’. The most obvious example of this is when
he bans Jia-Chien from becoming a chef so she can ‘learn something useful’. It
may seem like he was merely being cruel by forcing his daughter to go to business
school, but to Chu he was fulfilling his duty as the patriarch of the family by
looking out for the best interests of his daughter. Or more accurately, he was
fulfilling his duty as the patriarch of the family by looking out for the best
interest of his daughter according to him.
There is another moment when he is waking up his daughters that he expresses
love to one of his daughters, but he does this while she is asleep. Then, he
wakes her up by yelling.
One
scene that really exemplifies the status of the father is the first dinner
scene. The first full shot of the whole family is taken from the point of view
of the patriarch with the three daughters sitting at the table across and diagonal
from him. Then, when he leaves mid-way through that first dinner, the same shot
occurs, but with him absent. The dinner falls apart quickly without him there.
I must say, I give a lot of credit to Ang Lee to so easily show that Chu is the
keystone of the family in just a single short scene.
Content and Form
Before
I wrap things up, I want to touch on how much Eat Drink Man Woman reminded me of Ozu. Ang Lee does an excellent
job of capturing very average moments in the lives of Chu’s family, and he does
it with such precision it’s astounding. Although the scenes that are
conversational in nature have no specific form in their composition, the everyday
tasks are shot in what seems to be a very specific fashion. These scenes of the
more boring aspects of life, like doing the laundry, riding the bus, or getting
a massage, are shot with a fixed camera that doesn’t move. The angles are
always very specific, focusing not on the character(s), but on the action
itself.
Perhaps
the best example of this type of shot is found whenever someone is cooking. The
camera is fixed, occasionally moving with the hands as the chef works with a
precision that rivals that of the camera work. To Chu and Jia-Chien, cooking is
a form of meditation. As they do what comes naturally to them, they reflect on their
life, unwind, and express themselves. This sort of meditation is passed onto
the audience as it is captivated by the pure repetition and precision of his
movements. Anytime a shot like this occurs, it allows the viewer a moment to
catch their breath and reflect what is happening in the movie. In this sense, these
scenes are very much like an Ozu film.
The meticulousness
of these scenes also indicates another aspect of life that Ang Lee may have
been trying to get at. By treating these scenes with the same, if not more,
care as plot driven scenes, Ang Lee is saying that what a person does is just
as important, if not more, as what a person says, and who a person is
associated with. These tasks, although monotonous, are just as much a part of
life as anything else.
Conclusion
Although
this movie has some issues with patriarchy and feminism, what movie doesn’t? Eat Drink Man Woman is an excellent
film. The cinematography is fantastic, the plot and character development is
very well done, and the cooking scenes are really, really cool. It makes your
mouth water at times. I would recommend this to anyone who likes Ang Lee’s
other films, as it has many similar themes and stylistic choices. I would also recommend
this film to anyone who is a fan of Chinese cuisine (seriously, it’s not fair
how good those meals look) or anyone who likes dramas. In the film, Old Wen
asks Chu, “Eat, drink, man, woman… Is there more to life?” I think that Ang Lee’s
film Eat Drink Man Woman shows with
ease that there is in fact much, much more.
From your blossay, I don't get the sense that these women are victims, as is the case with almost every other film we've seen in this class. They are as integral in controlling their lives as the men are because they allow it to happen. It also cool that the way Chu shows his love for his daughters enforces the patriarchy because making their dinner is another way of providing for them: both monetarily (because it's his profession) and as nourishment (cause noms).
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your blossay because you do a great job in describing the film and its integral aspects. I also was able to relate a bit to the film, being from a family of three daughters, and the feministic and patriarchal aspects of the film are worthwhile to look at. The comparison to Ozu's type of cinematography was interesting as well, seeing that both Late Spring and Eat Drink Man Woman focus on the everyday lives of normal people. You really make the film sound interesting, capturing my attention and making me want to watch it as well.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the feedback Stephanie!
DeleteMan Eat Drink Woman is available in the library, and I would definitely reccomend checking it out. It really is a great film.
-Rob
These are really difficult to comment on without having seen the movie, but, one makes due. I'd agree with Tiphany that the issues with women are far less problematic than the other films we've watched. You make good arguments for how the film presents them in less than ideal roles, but it seems that there is some feminist qualities in each (The second sister's casual relationship as sexual equality, two of the sisters having jobs that are better than the father's, etc). Of course, I haven't actually seen it, so it could be portrayed much differently. It seems that Chu makes a difficult argument for the patriarchy, since he seems like a decent father, but you make a good argument for it, though if the films we've seen are any indicator, tradition has a huge effect on it, and perhaps that would have been interesting to look at. Don't let my comments mislead however- a well written and interesting read. Well done.
ReplyDeleteTiphany and Taylor,
ReplyDeleteI'm going to try to address both of your concerns at once, since they are closely related/the same.
Yes, you guys are correct when they don't seem like 'victims', at least in the traditional sense. They are victims of patriarchy in that they are oppressed and shaped by the patriarchal and sexist world around them. Sure, the issues are less extreme but, to use an extreme example, not all murders are like those found in the SAW series. We were really only exposed to incredibly obvious, extreme, and violent examples of patriarchy, sexism, etc. However, in real life, such issues are rarely obvious, which is what makes them so hard to address and talk about.
As for the daughter "allowing it to happen", this brings up a difficult issue with socialization in a particular culture. Basically, these girls were raised in a patriarchal society. From an early age they were taught "rules" through social and cultural context. It was all they ever knew. So, when something that is less than ideal occurs, it is accepted as normal (for the most part). This is what makes consent such a tricky issue. To explore this deeper, we can look at the following (simplified) example:
- Sam picks Door A over Door B by hir own free will.
Obviously, this is an ideal situation. Sam had two options and, on hir own, picked one option.
- Sam picks Door A over Door B at gunpoint.
This is the opposite of the first example. In this case, it doesn't even matter that the other option was even there or if Sam knew about the other option. Door B is inaccessible to hir thanks to violence.
- Sam picks Door A over Door B after hearing for hir entire life that Door A is better than Door B.
- Sam picks Door A over Door B after hearing for hir entire life that people who pick Door B are freaks, aren't normal, etc. People who pick Door B are often socially and culturally alienated in said society.
- Sam pick Door A over Door B but does not know Door B even exists.
These last three examples are the ones that are most common today and the types of scenarios that were portrayed in the film. They are definitely in a grey area when it comes to consent and free choice. The way a lot of philosophers describe this is as a 'limit' on your freedom or your free will. The two most common types of limits are usually described as hereditary and environmental. Hereditary limits are those that come from your genetic coding (i.e. males not being able to give birth, bad eyesight, genetically caused physical and mental handicaps, etc.) Environmental limits are things like being raised in a city and thus not being able to grow your own food or living in a totalitarian state. Growing up in a patriarchal society is an environmental limit that sectionalizes gender (thus creating gender roles and various other problems), stereotypes, objectifies, and commodifies women, and places men as the dominant gender socially, economically, and politically.
Also, the Father actually had a job more prestigious than his family. He was the head chef at a very popular and famous traditional Chinese restaurant and was considered one of the last masters of his craft. By looking back at some of the scenes, it appears that he as 20, maybe even 30 chefs working underneath of him.
Oh, and Tiphany… Bonus points for saying "cause noms".
-Rob